Sunday, April 4, 2010

Election in Iraq; Good News or Bad

     Today I am going to talk about the Iraqi elections. I disagree! Me being a monarchist, I don't think they should have a president. They should have a king like in the very old days. It was way way better for them in the 1800's. I am not sure if the elections were rigged by the president or not. Either way I do not think everyone should protest because he did win, and you must not question who is in charge. The good thing though is they are not killing so many people like they did a couple years ago.

     The Iraq War is what I am talking about. The U.S.A. was killing all those Iraqis just because they had a few bombs that they most likely were not going to use. The U.S. had bombs; most everywhere had bombs during that time. I think both sides should have called peace or at least been less hostile. One good thing that happened, though, was Saddam Hussein died.(he really shouldn't have died; they should have locked him up in jail.) The only reason why I am happy about that is he made monarchs look bad by killing all those innocent people.

     Everyone thought the elections would make everything better but in the end it just caused fighting, mischief, and discontent. It was actually better with a king. So if you are asking me what I think about the Iraq War I would say it is horrible and a king is the only way to go. By the way, the Iraq War is only half as bad as the French Revolution.


4 comments:

  1. What Iraq need is a president or at least anything that is not a king. Violence is the key here. I hope they put Saddam Hussein on the guilltine, but they ahve it banned now, they call it "unhumane"! I love hwo they had an election if only France could have one of those I would be so delighted.

    Your worst enemy,
    Chavlin

    ReplyDelete
  2. Iraq having a president is not even close to a good idea. When they had a king in Iraq everything was peaceful and it was good for everyone (except for one Saddam Hussein was in charge.) France was also the best with a king. When there was a king there was rarely any killing.

    From
    Sir Andrew

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also think that they should stick to the monarchy because in England it worked for us and it shall for in Iraq. Me and my friend Sir Awndrew are both loyal to our king and queen and the whole royal family. The only good thing to come from this is that they are not being like the frenchies and killing everyone.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sir Percy here, I think that they should always have had a monarchy. What is the purpose of having a President, we should have a King and a Queen like we have been doing since the 1800s. I still can't believe that they don't have a king. What are those people in the 21 century thinking?

    ReplyDelete